Sharonell Fulton, et al. v. City of Philadelphia

Becket Role:
Case Start Date:
May 16, 2018
Deciding Court:
U.S. Supreme Court
Original Court:
Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Supreme Court Status:
Practice Area(s):

Case Snapshot

As dedicated foster parents, Sharonell Fulton and Toni Simms-Busch are heroes to countless kids. Between them, they have welcomed more than 45 foster kids into their loving homes—the majority of whom came from disadvantaged communities and experienced severe trauma. To do the hard work of caring for these kids, Sharonell and Toni (both Catholic themselves) partner with Catholic Social Services, one of the most successful foster agencies in Philadelphia. But in March 2018, the city government stopped placing kids with foster parents that partner with Catholic Social Services (like Sharonell and Toni), demanding that the agency change its religious practices or close this important ministry.

Catholic Social Services serves all children in need, regardless of race, religion, or sexual orientation. The majority (roughly 70%) of the children Catholic Social Services serves are Black and other racial minorities. As part of the Catholic Church, however, the agency can’t endorse same-sex or unmarried couples as agency partners serving foster children in need. Instead, Catholic Social Services will help these couples find another agency that can partner with them.

In May 2018, several foster moms stood with Catholic Social Services to challenge the city’s unlawful exclusion of this agency and its families from the foster care system. The Supreme Court will hear their case in November 2020. Catholic Social Services and its foster families—represented by Becket—are hopeful that the Court will protect their freedom to continue serving kids in need without compromising their deeply held religious beliefs.


On April 22, 2019, the Third Circuit denied Catholic Social Services’ request to protect its ministry while litigation proceeds. In July 2019, Becket asked the Supreme Court to take up the case and on February 24, 2020, the Supreme Court agreed. Oral argument took place on November 4, 2020, and a decision is expected by June of 2021.

Case Summary

Faith-Based Foster Care Fact Sheet

Free To Foster: Read about heroic foster families

A history of heroic service in the City of Brotherly Love

Sharonell Fulton and Toni Simms-Busch each have decades of experience in the foster care system. Sharonell has fostered 40 children, and Toni spent years working as a foster care social worker and child advocate before fostering and adopting herself. These two Catholic women chose to partner with Catholic Social Services because they wanted to work with a faith-affirming agency and were impressed by its excellent reputation.

The Catholic Church pioneered foster care in Philadelphia over 200 years ago when it founded an agency to help mothers, children, and families in need. Inspired and motivated by its religious identity, Catholic Social Services has been providing critical foster care services to children ever since. It is one of the most successful foster agencies in the city and has a great reputation. Catholic Social Services’ faith (and its ability to recruit foster families who are inspired by their own faith) is a big part of its success. It’s also proved excellent at supporting and retaining foster families. Catholic Social Services’ caseworkers build strong relationships with both foster kids and their families, and are available any time—day or night. When Sharonell took in new foster kids on Christmas Eve, Catholic Social Services’ caseworkers delivered wrapped presents to her door.

But today, because of the city’s discriminatory actions, loving foster families that partner with Catholic Social Services (like Sharonell and Toni) are stuck on the sidelines—their homes sitting empty—even though the government has admitted that there are kids in immediate need of their love and support.

Making room for diversity

When someone wants to become a foster parent, the first step is to contact a private foster agency (there are 30 in Philadelphia) and complete a home study. Home studies are deeply personal and require the agency to send someone into the family’s home to assess things like the strength of their personal relationships, their physical and mental health, and their relationships with their children. Only once this is completed can an agency partner with the foster family to help care for a child in need.

As part of the Catholic Church, Catholic Social Services cannot partner with and endorse same-sex or unmarried couples. Instead, it will help that couple to find a match from among the 29 other nearby foster agencies that can provide the same endorsement and partner with that couple to serve kids in need. Three of these other agencies are even recognized for their excellence in serving the LGBTQ community.

Agencies help foster families find a better match all the time (like, for example, if a family lives too far away, or the agency has a long waiting list, or a couple is seeking to foster kids with special needs). But this wasn’t enough for city officials, who demanded that if a same-sex couple ever approached Catholic Social Services (none had), the agency had to endorse their relationship and partner with them.

Catholic Social Services’ religious beliefs and traditions aren’t a policy or set of guidelines it can change. The agency walks with the Catholic Church in its teachings about marriage and family as well as its commitment to serving the local community—and all parts of the human family—as best it can. This is why the agency is committed to serving all children in need—regardless of their race, religion, or sexual orientation.

Sidelining all-stars while kids are left hanging

In Philadelphia, there are dozens of private agencies that partner with LGBTQ foster parents. And same-sex couples have been fostering kids in Philadelphia for years with their help. Nothing about this case would change that. Instead, Catholic Social Services wants to continue serving vulnerable kids and foster families without compromising its beliefs (as it has done successfully for the last 200 years) alongside a diverse network of other agencies also serving the Philadelphia community. Catholic Social Services has loving families ready to care for kids today, but the government is keeping them on the sidelines.

Faith-affirming foster care and adoption providers nationwide are looking to the Supreme Court to protect their religious freedom. Without help from the Supreme Court, many of the over 8,000 faith-affirming providers across the country—and the families they serve—will be forced out of the foster care system, leaving children in need with fewer loving homes. They want to be part of the solution to this crisis, too.

Foster moms are asking the Supreme Court to protect the agency that affirms their religious identity

In May 2018, Becket stepped in to represent children, families, and Catholic Social Services in their lawsuit against Philadelphia’s government. In June 2018, Becket asked a federal court to end the government’s discriminatory actions and let Catholic Social Services serve foster kids and families. In July 2018, the district court denied the request, and Becket immediately appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

In April 2019, the Third Circuit ruled against Sharonell Fulton, Toni Simms-Busch, and Catholic Social Services in a controversial decision that split with several other appeals courts. Becket then asked the Supreme Court to take up their case and protect the freedom of faith-affirming foster agencies nationwide to maintain their deeply held beliefs while serving those most in need. On February 24, 2020, the Supreme Court agreed to hear this case. Oral argument took place on November 4, 2020, and a decision is expected by June of 2021.

Importance to religious liberty

  • Religious FreedomReligious organizations must be free to act according to their faith, including when caring for children in need. The government cannot discriminate against religious groups by demanding they give up their religious beliefs in order to continue providing much needed social services.
  • Public SquareFaith-affirming organizations serve their neighbors and provide benefits to the community when they are able to operate in the public square. Religion in the public square is not a threat, but rather the expression of a natural human impulse.