Colorado Christian University v. Azar
Share this Case
Colorado Christian University is the first interdenominational Christian college to challenge in federal court a new Obamacare mandate that requires private employers to pay for abortifacients in their group health plans. Colorado Christian joined the monks at Belmont Abbey College pushing back against government intrusion into personal religious convictions that is unprecedented in the health care realm. Becket represents both colleges in their separate lawsuits.
The Health and Human Services regulation mandates that all group health insurance plans must provide FDA-approved contraceptives at no charge to consumers, including the abortifacients Plan B (morning-after pill) and ella (week-after pill), and sterilization services.
Many Evangelical Christians do not share Catholics’ objection to contraception and sterilization, but most—including Colorado Christian—strongly oppose abortion, including abortifacient drugs.
For almost a century, Colorado Christian University has offered an education that develops students intellectually, professionally, and spiritually. Faith is central to the educational mission of Colorado Christian, which is to cultivate knowledge and love of God in a Christ-centered community, with an enduring commitment to spiritual formation, and engagement with the world. Based near Denver with satellite campuses around Colorado, the college is a member of the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities and has 3,500 undergraduate and graduate students.
Colorado Christian’s lawsuit was filed on December 21, 2011 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. The lawsuit challenges the HHS regulations as violations of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and the Administrative Procedures Act.
On August 7, 2013, Colorado Christian University became the first non-profit to refile its lawsuit against the HHS Mandate’s “accommodation,” which still forced the Christian university to violate its deeply held religious beliefs or pay crippling fines.
On October 6, 2017, the government issued a new rule with a broader religious exemption. The rule may be changed after the government considers the comments it receives. Becket attorney Mark Rienzi stated, “It should be easy for the courts to finalize this issue now that the government admits it broke the law. For months, we have been waiting for Department of Justice lawyers to honestly admit that fact, like the President did in the Rose Garden five months ago. Now that the agencies admit the mandate was illegal, we expect the leadership of the Department of Justice will cooperate in getting a final court resolution.”