San Francisco Appeals Court Rejects Religious Discrimination Claims Against Christian Shelter Ruling Offers Protection to All Religious Shelters
Melinda Skea 202-349-7224 email@example.com
Today, September 19, 2011, the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco unanimously rejected a fair housing advocacy group’s religious discrimination lawsuit against the Boise Rescue Mission, a Christian organization dedicated to serving the poor needy, and homeless in Boise, Idaho. The ruling offers valuable protection to religious shelters across the country.
In 2008 the Boise Rescue Mission was sued by the Intermountain Fair Housing Council, a federally funded fair housing activist group, over two of the Mission’s ministries: a homeless shelter for men, and a Christian discipleship program for women recovering from substance abuse. Guests of the two ministries alleged that the Rescue Mission engaged in unlawful religious discrimination by encouraging attendance at chapel services at the homeless shelter and by requiring members of the discipleship program to participate in religious activities.
In a unanimous ruling authored by Judge Susan P. Graber, an appointee of President Clinton, the Ninth Circuit rejected all claims. “Our Constitution and civil rights laws protect the right of religious groups to minister to the poor and needy in accordance with their religious beliefs,” said Luke Goodrich, Deputy National Litigation Director at The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty. Goodrich argued the case for the Mission at the Ninth Circuit.
Participation in the Rescue Mission’s ministries is completely voluntary and free of charge, and the Mission receives no government funding. By contrast, the Intermountain Fair Housing Council that sued the Rescue Mission received over $874,000 in federal funding from 2008 to 2010 to bring lawsuits like this one.
“Especially in these economic times, it makes no sense for federal taxpayers to subsidize baseless lawsuits against religious ministries who are trying to help the poor. The resources required to defend lawsuits ought to go towards food and shelter for the homeless,” added Goodrich.